Republican Party: Social Conservatives Out, Diversity In!

In yet another sign that the Republican Party is clueless as to why it lost the 2012 Presidential Election, a new post-election analysis, ironically named, “Growth and Opportunity Project,” was released today by the Republican National Committee. The report was apparently compiled in response to the drubbing that the Republicans received in national elections (President and Senate) last Fall. According to Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, “When Republicans lost in November, it was a wakeup call. From a quick perusal of the report, it would appear that Republicans are still asleep. If they believe that implementing the recommendations in this report will lead to a revitalization of the GOP and a return to the White House and majority status in the Senate, the powers-that-be are sadly mistaken.

The “Growth and Opportunity Project’s” philosophy can be summed up in the following statement:

Instead of driving around in circles on an ideological cul-de-sac, we need a Party whose brand of conservatism invites and inspires new people to visit us. We need to remain America’s conservative alternative to big-government, redistribution-to-extremes liberalism, while building a route into our Party that a non-traditional Republican will want to travel. Our standard should not be universal purity; it should be a more welcoming conservatism. (Introduction to Messaging, page 7 of the Report)

This whole statement begs the question: “Who is driving around in circles on an ideological cul-de-sac and what are the these so-called ideological cul-de-sacs anyway?” From a reading of the report, it becomes clear that social conservatives are the ones who need to be placed in the back of the bus and told that “intolerant” discussion on issues like immigration reform and gay rights will no longer be tolerated. Make no mistake — Senator Rob Portman’s recent announcement supporting same-sex marriage is just the beginning of a seismic shift within the Republican Party on this issue.

It should come as no surprise that “welcoming” language, often used by many local Methodist churches (Sen. Portman, perhaps not coincidentally, is also a Methodist), has been included in the report. And, when “welcoming” language is used in relation to gay rights and same-sex marriage, it really means “affirming” as well. In a section of the report entitled, “America Looks Different,” the third recommendation that was proposed is:

3. When it comes to social issues, the Party must in fact and deed be inclusive and welcoming. If we are not, we will limit our ability to attract young people and others, including many women, who agree with us on some but not all issues.” (America Looks Different, page 10 of the Report)

What does this recommendation mean for the Republican Party’s position on traditional marriage? It means that, having stuck a finger in the wind, that the Growth and Opportunity Party (as they now want to be known instead of the Grand Old Party) will embrace the agenda of younger generations, particularly on the issues of gay marriage and gay rights, by the time the next Presidential election rolls around in 2016. If social conservatives — including many conservative Christians — want to remain on the GOP bus, they will be welcomed as long as they get with the new program of including and welcoming the new position on “diversity.”

For the GOP to appeal to younger voters, we do not have to agree on every issue, but we do need to make sure young people do not see the Party as totally intolerant of alternative points of view. Already, there is a generational difference within the conservative movement about issues involving the treatment and the rights of gays — and for many younger voters, these issues are a gateway into whether the Party is a place they want to be.

If our Party is not welcoming and inclusive, young people and increasingly other voters will continue to tune us out. The Party should be proud of its conservative principles, but just because someone disagrees with us on 20 percent of the issues, that does not mean we cannot come together on the rest of the issues where we do agree. (America Looks Different, page 10 of the Report)
This report, from beginning to end, is nothing more than a “Democrat-lite” philosophy. If the ruling elites within the Republican Party believe that the “Growth and Opportunity Project” will lead them out of the wilderness and into the Promised Land, they are sadly mistaken. If this is the direction that the Republican Establishment wants to head in the coming years, then they can expect social conservatives — including Evangelical Christians — to stay home in 2016.  Why would I want to vote for a Republican that has no core convictions other than to stay in power. If I wanted to do that, I’d just vote Democrat!

 


Comments

Republican Party: Social Conservatives Out, Diversity In! — 4 Comments

  1. I have been saying for YEARS that the evangelical practice of hitching their agenda to the Republicans was a horrible idea. Politics and the Gospel do not mix because politicians are by very definition pragmatists. It has been pragmatic for the GOP to work with Christians because they were a solid voting block but now that our societal influence has waned we can be cast aside. Hopefully this is the beginning of a shift away from focusing on politics as a way to change our nation and begin a move back to the Gospel.

    • Ryan,

      I believe you are exactly correct in your analysis of Evangelicals and the Republican Party. Too many Christians — including many Southern Baptists — did hitch their wagons to the GOP. Perhaps because of an alignment of beliefs and perhaps because of pragmatism and access to power, the marriage (as Richard Land once described it) between Evangelicals and the Republican Party was consummated. Now, however, the Evangelicals, much like an older wife who no longer benefits the husband, has been traded in for a younger, more attractive model. This should not surprise us — although perhaps it should sadden us — given the fact that the “G” in GOP has never stood for the Gospel. I agree with your last sentence and hope as well that we will see many Evangelicals/Southern Baptists relying more on the power of the Gospel than the power of politics. There is no comparison, but it takes some longer than others to figure out. Thanks for stopping by and for sharing your thoughts. God bless,

      Howell

    • Ryan:

      You are so correct in that the GOP looked to Christians as a solid voting block. But now they believe Christians should be cast aside so that they get elected or re-elected.

      IMO for far too many years the SBC has been mixing politics and religion and it did not work.

      I also agree let’s move back to the Gospel.

  2. Pingback: Misappropriating the Cross in Gay Marriage Debate - From Law to Grace | From Law to Grace

Leave a Reply